Wikipedia:Editor review/Codrinb

Codrinb
Happy New Year! This is my first request for a review and looking for all the feedback I can get. I've been a user for a few years, but only recently I've become very involved as an editor. I learned as much as I can and still learning. Codrin.B (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I've been very involved in organizing articles around Dacia topic and the history of Geto-Dacians. For that I proposed and later created WikiProject Dacia, Proiect:Dacia (Romanian version) and organized Dacia and Dacians on Commons. I then started creating and improving many articles on the subject, including Amutria, Argidava, List of Dacian towns, Grigore Tocilescu. I've been paying a lot of attention to article formatting, organization and references, based on what I learned so far. I've been also actively recruiting Wikipedians for these projects.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I started a dispute at Ratiaria about how my categories and stubs were replaced (I believe out of some masked nationalism) by Bulgarian-related categories only, although the subject was Ancient Dacia and Rome. I got some relatively good but not completely convincing counter-arguments which I accepted. No one disputed my content yet. Some of my articles, which I was planning to expand and/or invite others with stub templates were merged/moved into related articles. Again, I got some good arguments which I accepted and some good advice from other editors.
 * I started a dispute at Ratiaria about how my categories and stubs were replaced (I believe out of some masked nationalism) by Bulgarian-related categories only, although the subject was Ancient Dacia and Rome. I got some relatively good but not completely convincing counter-arguments which I accepted. No one disputed my content yet. Some of my articles, which I was planning to expand and/or invite others with stub templates were merged/moved into related articles. Again, I got some good arguments which I accepted and some good advice from other editors.

 Reviews  You seem to have done much impressive work on WikiProject Dacia. Everything I looked at seemed good to me, but then I know nothing about the subject! Your contributions in Romanian and to Wikimedia Commons combine with your English language Wikipedia efforts to make a really worthwhile contribution. Keep it up! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

 Comment

I would like to extend my review period and hopefully get more reviews. Since I posted this request, I had the chance to work on many other articles, as you can see on my contributions list. Thanks! --Codrin.B (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)