Wikipedia:Editor review/Colds7ream

Colds7ream
Hi everyone; I've been an editor here for getting on three years now, mostly in the area of Human spaceflight, but also recently in NPP and Account creation. I'd just like to get a good idea of how the community thinks I'm doing - any good points, any bad points, and any ideas as to how I can improve my editing. Many thanks in advance! Colds7ream (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi there, Colds7ream! You've been doing very well with Twinkle and also making solid contributions to articles.  You also seem to be collaborating a lot with your WikiProject to improve articles.  One thing I would recommend you do is to work in more collaborative areas of Wikipedia; for example, WP:XfD and maybe even here at WP:ER.  Keep it up!  -  down  load  |   sign!  23:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll give XfD a go! :-) Thanks! Colds7ream (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, you meet User:A_Nobody in that you have never been blocked, but rather have awards and good/featured article credits on your userpage. Well done!  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your article improvements have been very good. I enjoyed working with you on International Space Station. My suggestions for improvement would be to go through Tony's copyediting exercises, if you haven't already. Also, in peer reviews and article assessments, you could be more proactive in addressing comments. Make sure you address all the concerns raised by the reviewer. When you fix one of the issues, go through the rest of the article to make they didn't miss similar problems. Hope to see more FAs from you soon! Wronkiew (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments, Wronkiew - I'll see what I can do to improve in those areas, and have a go at the copyediting exercises. :-) Colds7ream (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm particularly pleased with my work on the Shuttle-Mir Program article, which I first came across as a stub that was being discussed on its talk page for deletion, and expanded to meet the Featured Article Criteria, leading to its appearance on the Main Page in 2007. More recently, I'm quite pleased with my work on getting Salyut 6 to GA status, and my ongoing work with the International Space Station article, which is proving a long, hard road to FAC. :-)
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There have been a couple of issues I've come across with the International Space Station article, and I generally extricate myself from them by calling in a third opinion, either informally or, on one occasion, via WP:3O. I also find FAC and GAC fairly stressful, but am able to look on the bright side afterward, when the circle or star is awarded. I feel that community involvement in issues is essential, due to the importance of keeping to the central tenet of concensus writing that we hold.
 * There have been a couple of issues I've come across with the International Space Station article, and I generally extricate myself from them by calling in a third opinion, either informally or, on one occasion, via WP:3O. I also find FAC and GAC fairly stressful, but am able to look on the bright side afterward, when the circle or star is awarded. I feel that community involvement in issues is essential, due to the importance of keeping to the central tenet of concensus writing that we hold.