Wikipedia:Editor review/Colourful Bling

Colourful Bling
Hi! I joined on April 11, 2012! Colourful Bling (talk - contribs) 16:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I've reverted a few bits of vandalism.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Not yet, other than not being able to edit because of my IP. But, Global IP Block Exempt was granted to my account.
 * Not yet, other than not being able to edit because of my IP. But, Global IP Block Exempt was granted to my account.

 Reviews 


 * Coulourful Bling has a good sounding user name, but has done very little here so far. Eastern Intercollegiate Baseball League was started, and despite have a major expansion tag there seems to be nothing happening there. For a ?new? user it is a good idea to actually write articles to get the hang of what to do.  This user seems strangely knowledgeable about markup and tagging of articles to be truly a new user and likely already has hundreds to thousands of edits prior to registering with this user.
 * Tagging is not up to scratch at this point in time, so Thomas Edge should not have primary sources on it, as the material was written centuries after the man in the article. Henham Halt railway station should not have unreferenced as it had two references. The Bird is Gone: A Manifesto is overtagged, grammar is OK, and cleanup is too vague. Instead of tagging Philippe Bouchet you could fix it yourself. It looks perfectly well wikified, so I don't know why that got put on.  Tagclusters on the top of articles look ugly, so should be avoided if not needed. On Hypena crassalis there was a tag, then a fix, but you did not detag. Instead of asking for permissions, which will not be granted you yet, you should be getting a few months of experience editing or writing articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagging is not up to scratch at this point in time, so Thomas Edge should not have primary sources on it, as the material was written centuries after the man in the article. Henham Halt railway station should not have unreferenced as it had two references. The Bird is Gone: A Manifesto is overtagged, grammar is OK, and cleanup is too vague. Instead of tagging Philippe Bouchet you could fix it yourself. It looks perfectly well wikified, so I don't know why that got put on.  Tagclusters on the top of articles look ugly, so should be avoided if not needed. On Hypena crassalis there was a tag, then a fix, but you did not detag. Instead of asking for permissions, which will not be granted you yet, you should be getting a few months of experience editing or writing articles. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)