Wikipedia:Editor review/ComputerGuy 4

ComputerGuy
Well, I'm back for a fourth review. Since my previous December review, I took a hiatus from editing, joined the Sounders FC task force of WikiProject Footballl, and I've improved my editing skills and my userpage. – CG Talk 17:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Most of my contributions go towards Washington's highway system and Seattle's MLS team. I am proud of my 18 GAs in the road category and would eventually like one related to the Seattle Sounders FC.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've had no major disputes, although in the past, I confronted Freewayguy about his edit warring and eventually he gave up and conceded. In the future, I'll use reasoning and common sense to confront vandals.
 * I've had no major disputes, although in the past, I confronted Freewayguy about his edit warring and eventually he gave up and conceded. In the future, I'll use reasoning and common sense to confront vandals.

 Reviews 

Review by PrincessofLlyr

Sorry you've had to wait so long for a review. Things are a little backed up here. So, after looking through your userpage and talk since December and quickly looking through your edits, here's my review. Pretty much, I don't see anything wrong. If someone else gives a full, detailed review they might come up with something more to say, but I think you're fine just working as you are. If you have any questions or comments feel free to leave them here or on my talk page. PrincessofLlyr royal court 20:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm impressed. Your article work, especially the number of GA's, DYK's, etc. is amazing. Keep that up! Strong article work is a dying skill. (I'm guilty of not doing it myself)
 * Likewise, the balance between your work on articles and elsewhere is very good. Not too many talk page edits, but enough to indicate that you will discuss things.
 * It doesn't seem that you've ever participated in WP:RFA or some of the behind-the-scenes community areas, so you could get into that if you want. Also, since you've had so many yourself, have you ever considered reviewing good articles?