Wikipedia:Editor review/Condem

User:Condem
I'm not going in for an RFA, I just want to know how people feel I'm getting along. Check out my talk page edits as well as other edits. What could I have done better? Con D  e  m Talk 23:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 

 Comments 
 * I find her a very, very great user. Long talk page, nice, friendly, good user page. Don't see anything wrong. General Eisenhower 23:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, I'm a guy not a girl. Not that it matters. Please see my edits, not just my user pages! Con  D  e  m Talk 23:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Your signature is kind of girly (no offense) -- George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 00:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Same thing as General Isenhower, (except the girl part)-- George Mon  e  y Talk   Contribs 00:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * In my (perhaps limited) experience, Condem has been a good editor - balanced, thoughtful, and communicative. I don't really have anything constructive to say, in fact. ;-) Disclaimer: I have known Condem personally for quite a while. James F. (talk) 00:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Very friendly, sociable and likeable user; definitely a good people person. Equally skilled in the area of multitasking, with the ability to undertake a wide variety of WikiTasks. However, a bit more specialization (i.e. focus) on one or two tasks might improve the edit yield greatly. Also, a bit more activity at pages such as WP:AFD, WP:RFA and pages of such blood would be very beneficial. But so far, good job! :)  _-M      o      P-_   01:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I can't really say a lot, because I've only just met this user, but she seems pretty likeable. — [[Image:Flag_of_Ottawa%2C_Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|20px]]  nath a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W) 08:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the only name in the review section that I recognized. I've seen Condem's comments in a few AfD discussions--always very civil and fair.  Memorably, after bringing up vanity issues regarding the Green Bloggers article, I noticed that he wrote a kind note of explanation on the author's talk page.  Nice to see someone taking the extra step to reach out to an new user. -MrFizyx 03:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage
 * As English Wikipedia is no longer replicating data to the toolserver, Condem's edit count (as of 08:08, 19 April 2006 (UTC)) using Interiot's Tool 2 is:
 * Username	Condem
 * Total edits	1629
 * Distinct pages edited	952
 * Average edits/page	1.711
 * First edit	21:44, 6 February 2006


 * (main)	872
 * Talk	45
 * User	177
 * User talk	334
 * Image	3
 * Template	7
 * Template talk	6
 * Category	3
 * Wikipedia	177
 * Wikipedia talk	5

 Questions


 * 1) Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Answer I am pleased with the article I started on the film Pierrepoint and also on the way I've handled vandalism. Con  D  e  m Talk 23:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Answer Some users (nameless) have caused me stress, but I have always remained calm, and objective, and have handled things in the best way I thought possible. I have not been involved in any major conflicts. Con  D  e  m Talk