Wikipedia:Editor review/Corpx

Corpx
Hi, I'd to become an administrator so that I can help out with the WP:AIV and WP:RFPP and sometimes the WP:DRV pages. The pages often get backlogged and vandalism escalates in articles due to the lack of immediate response. Corpx 19:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Ah, Corpx. To tell you the truth, I thought you already were an admin. However, since you're not, I'll give you a few suggestions on how you could improve:
 * At this time, you've got a (relatively) low edit count of just under 3k. For some reason I don't understand, many people will oppose your RfA based on the fact you've got under 5k.
 * I'd like to see more participation in the admin areas you're going to work in. 225 WP-space edits is unavoidably low (although I really appreciate your hard work on WP:AIV)!
 * You are a great vandal fighter and I'd be happy to support you when your RfA time comes! Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 22:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My anti-vandalism reverts. Since I've been using VandalProof, it's much easier to revert vandals while applying warnings on their page.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * When I first started using VP, I had gotten carried away and applied inapproprate warnings, but a couple of users pointed this out to me and kept reminding me about good faith edits.  I think I'm a much better editor today than when I started.
 * When I first started using VP, I had gotten carried away and applied inapproprate warnings, but a couple of users pointed this out to me and kept reminding me about good faith edits.  I think I'm a much better editor today than when I started.