Wikipedia:Editor review/Crisco 1492

Crisco 1492
Hi, I am here to get a review of my editing habits in preparation for a possible RfA within the next few months. I have been a Wikipedian since 2006 and have roughly 4000 edits, mostly within the last few months. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I contribute to a lot of different parts of the encyclopedia. I mostly do stuff at WP:RFF, WP:AFD, and T:TDYK, but I also write my own articles, improve some I see, fight vandalism, review articles, translate Indonesian language articles already here, welcome new users, and so forth. I have also uploaded numerous pictures to the Commons as well as pictures and a sound file to Wikipedia. The most pleasing of these is my work at RFF; not only do I feel like I am helping new editors find their footing, I am also pleased that this feedback has been recognized as good by User:Bob House 884.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * The one that stands out most in my mind is when I did a major revision of Sleman Regency. User:Merbabu and User:SatuSuro posted some comments on my talk page that I took offense to, but we worked it out in the end. We discussed it thoroughly and I referenced everything as they requested. I learned to do my best to cite whenever I can, even though the guidelines are to cite contentious material. There may have been some other, minor conflicts but nothing serious.
 * The one that stands out most in my mind is when I did a major revision of Sleman Regency. User:Merbabu and User:SatuSuro posted some comments on my talk page that I took offense to, but we worked it out in the end. We discussed it thoroughly and I referenced everything as they requested. I learned to do my best to cite whenever I can, even though the guidelines are to cite contentious material. There may have been some other, minor conflicts but nothing serious.


 * Note. I have reviewed Eleassar (diff) and STATicVerseatide (diff) as suggested above. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Hello there. After an evaluation of your editor's review, as well as your talk page and other things, so far, your edits are so far good, as well as your intro page, which I believe is mostly (not completely) organized. The good thing is that you are committed to editing articles that matters to you, which I am very pleased so far. There are only a couple of improvements that you could change, but you do not have to take my word for it:

First of all, it would be helpful if you developed your own talk page policy if you do not want users to misuse your talk page. Additionally, I saw that you only have one archive page of your own. I do recommend that you create a yearly (or a monthly) archive page with the specified dates (e.g. 1/1/11 to 12/31/11). You can search those up on Wikipedia if you like, as the formats may be different from others.

Second of all, for privacy reasons, I think your personal information is a tad too much, as I felt that such things like the date of birth that you have written should only be for your personal use that many sites verify, but only when asked. If you wish, you can use more templates than what you have already. You can keep it as it is if you like, but I strongly suggest that you limit your personal information whenever possible. I will not say what else needs to be improved due to my commitment to my own privacy while on Wikipedia, but I hope those will help you be more secured when people visit your page or your talk page. CHAK 001 (talk) 08:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)