Wikipedia:Editor review/Cuddlyable3

Cuddlyable3*
Cuddlyable3 21:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I'm happy to honor your request for a review. You're one of the few editors I've seen with a long record of experience but a low edit count. That's okay, but in this age of addicted RC patrollers and minor edit wizards, it's a rare find.

The main issue of concern is your conflict with User:WikipedianProlific at Fuel injection, which spilled over to his recent unsuccessful RFA. I noticed that WJBscribe removed your questions at that RFA because he considered them a distraction from the mediation process: I assume you know what that means (because I don't). I also noticed that you used the word "arbitration" when suggesting that a third party might need to choose which image best illustrates fuel injection. It's best not to use that word except regarding ArbCom; otherwise, dispute resolution is the preferred term. As much as I respect your desire to come up with the best possible image, due respect is earned by W.Prolific, whose diagram is now marked as featured, and is very informative to me as a college graduate but not an engineer.

Otherwise, your editing is fine. I'd like you to get more active in editing articles and not just talk pages. You seem interested in Physics and Engineering, so try WikiProject Physics, Portal:Physics and similar. Also scan the Community Portal (link on the left sidebar).

I wish you good luck. Shalom Hello 07:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Your answer here
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Your answer here
 * Your answer here

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

1. I am particularly pleased with my contributions to Self-similarity, FM and by having had two nominations to FPC. I think Wikipedia is a fine project in which I can be useful.

''2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?''

2. I am at a loss to know how to deal with the conflict situation which has arisen at Fuel_injection discussion. [Update on 23.07.2007: Issues which arose have been accepted for mediation.] I believe we should benefit from 3rd party advice.