Wikipedia:Editor review/Cyclonenim 2

Cyclonenim
I'm currently an active editor in areas related to medicine, and in areas such as WP:CSD, WP:AfD and WP:RfA, and I follow many other areas without contribution. I'm looking to undergo another request for adminship in the future and would like constructive feedback on my activity here before doing so :) —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 17:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello, friend. Honestly, I think you're the complete package and would make a great admin. Your first RfA was just too early, and since then you've participated a lot in admin areas, gone through coaching, and have built upon the feedback from your first editor review. The only suggestion I'd make is to participate more and more consistently in content creation and refinement. Looking at your last 500 edits, which goes back over a month, I see [correct me if I'm wrong] mostly TW use and talk page dialogue—no more than a few edits to any single article, and no FA or GA reviews. Plus, the article you've contributed to the most (Zygomycosis) is only B-class, even after receiving a PR (which, by the way, hasn't been fully utilized). Anyway, I appreciate who you are on Wikipedia and wish you the best in your future editing! --Eustress (talk) 23:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review, Eustress :) I should note that in recent times my focus has recently become one of working in policy areas, rather than articles, in order to try and build experience to become an administrator. This is simply a necessary loophole in order to pass an RfA these days, I fully intend to get back into editing pretty much full time after I run (if I pass). The same applies to reviews. Thanks again for your review, I'll cross post this to your talk page. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 23:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * By and large you seem to meet User:A_Nobody, i.e. commitment to editing articles some of which are good and featured on your userpage, no blocks, and no memorable negative interactions. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 20:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you, A Nobody. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 08:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * In response to my talk page message, I would indeed like to keep this open for longer. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 08:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * How much longer? There is a current backlog and this has been open for over a month.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   00:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * My apologies, if it's contributing to a backlog then you're free to close it. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 07:45, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * How much longer do you need?--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   01:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I do not strictly 'need' it to be open, it was just to gather opinion on my conduct. I can always open another in future if I need it. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 20:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm proud of all my article creations, listed on my talk page, as well as my contributions (which are, for the most part, also listed there). I was proud to review several GAs such as Phagocyte, which I passed, and I'm also proud to have significantly edited subarachnoid hemorrhage with other WikiProject Medicine editors in order to get that article to FA. I've also contributed to other articles which have gone on to GA status. In addition to my article work, I'm proud of my contributions to CSD and AfD.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I haven't had any real conflicts over editing, however, I have come across rather hostile negotiations and discussions with other users. The first of which was (now banned), whom I was in the wrong to critize (at the time, I'd probably retract my apology if we met again due to current circumstances), but we did eventually make up afterwards and continued to work constructively together in mainspace. The second conflict was with a user starting with Mihai (cannot remember the full name) who was attacking and atttempting to desysop . I got involved in this discussion and helped to draw to a close and negotiate discussions with this user, which I see as successful as this disruptive user left the project without a ban.