Wikipedia:Editor review/DCI2026 (2)

DCI2026 2*
I have been an editor since 2008, reviewing largely articles falling into the realms of history and fiction. I've also helped out with some processes, and, despite a fairly long absence recently, have edited consistently. This is my second editor review. dci &#124;  TALK   20:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to Wikipedia have been in the areas of content creation and review. I am particularly pleased by my reviewing and assistance with Lewis Nicola and various other GAN's I've reviewed, and am also pleased by my work on articles such as The Fall of Hyperion.  My reviews of Crac des Chevaliers, as well as other articles, also don't strike me as negative.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * My activity on Wikipedia has not caused me much stress. On the contrary, I find it enjoyable and constructive to help work on this project; in the case of a potential dispute with another editor, I would review my actions and those of the other person before taking further steps.
 * My activity on Wikipedia has not caused me much stress. On the contrary, I find it enjoyable and constructive to help work on this project; in the case of a potential dispute with another editor, I would review my actions and those of the other person before taking further steps.

 Reviews 




 * Please list all accounts that you have used, otherwise checking your contributions of one is just frustrating. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)