Wikipedia:Editor review/Dffgd

Dffgd
I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, and I wanted to see what other Wikipedians thought about what I've been doing. Dffgd (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I prefer to be a WikiGnome, staying out of things like writing articles, finding sources, etc., but I'm also a vandalism fighter/reverter, and I recently discovered WP:Template messages/User talk namespace which has been a help to warn. So I would say RCP and vandal fighting.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No, I haven't, and I hope not to be in any for a while. What I want to do if it happens is simply stick to policy, then I can't be wrong.
 * No, I haven't, and I hope not to be in any for a while. What I want to do if it happens is simply stick to policy, then I can't be wrong.

 Reviews 
 * Let's see...you seem to be an active vandal fighter, but it seems the majority of your edits are for vandal or the talk space(unless I'm mmistaken). I would suggest improving some articles. Also, it would be helpful to install twinkle which allows you to generate wanings much quicker. Jus go to Preferences/Gadgets/Editing gadgets and select Twinkle. Depending on your skin, there will either be a tab called warn when you or on a user talk page or a small tab called TW which if you go over it, will have some choices for you to select. Good job so far though!  Derild  49  2  1  01:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * About q2: The rules are not always right. See "understanding Ignore All Rules" —  m o n o   19:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But if I stick to policy I won't be wrong, policy will be wrong. dffgd (talk) 21:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The point is that sometimes you don't have to stick completely to policy. Wikipedia encourages editors to be bold. — MC10 ( T • C • GB •L)  22:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know, WP:BEBOLD in editing pages. That's not the same as a dispute. dffgd 00:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Policy is based on consensus, and consensus can change. IAR is useful in certain circumstances; adhering strictly to the policies will get you nowhere.  — fetch ·  comms   13:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)