Wikipedia:Editor review/Dogposter

Dogposter
I just want to see what others think about the editing I do on this site. Dog poster  21:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, do you think I would be a good admin if I get some more mainspace edits and experience? Dog poster  00:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Questions

 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I sometimes edit various science articles, but lately I have begun reverting vandalism more.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have never been in any major disputes, just some vandalism to my user page that was reverted and once had a minor argument over a redundant template.
 * I have never been in any major disputes, just some vandalism to my user page that was reverted and once had a minor argument over a redundant template.

Reviews

 * 1) I think that your vandalism work is great. Maybe some work patrolling the New pages to diversify your edits, but otherwise, you seem like a pretty good editor. By the way, watch your user page edits. I just realized they account for about 1/8 of your current edit count. *Pepper  piggle*  *Sign!*  22:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I don't edit userpages a lot anymore, but a while ago I edited mine quite a bit so even though I don't do that as much anymore, the edits are still in my record. I think they're fading out now. Dog  poster  14:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) I think that the Pepperpiggle put it perfectly and also I think you would make a great admin. Spike35031 (talk)