Wikipedia:Editor review/Dom497

Dom497
I mainly want an editor review just to see why other people see where my strengths and weakness' are here on the English Wikipedia. I hope to find out what areas I need to improve on in the future. Dom497 (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions her on Wikipedia is mainly articles that surround amusement parks and attractions. I have also recently began to help out with Good Article nominations by reviewing them and giving feedback to the nominators on what needs to be improved.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I have been in one or two disputes but I was able to take a step back and resolve the issue.
 * I have been in one or two disputes but I was able to take a step back and resolve the issue.

 Reviews 
 * Hi there. This request is out of date, but I will review it anyway.


 * My impression is that you are an capable editor, and a good coordinator. You are very active in trying to bring other editors together to work on projects (Amusement Parks and Good articles) that you have interest in. You seem to be aware of your limitations, and not afraid to consult other opinions when you are unsure of something.


 * You have taken initiative in many task force, and seem to have a clear vision of what you want to achieve. The best way to ease any doubtful opinions is to just do it, and you are one of the great examples.


 * I cannot seen to find any weakness other than making typos occasionally. But that's probably just because you follow Wikipedia on your phone most of the time.


 * Brilliant editor. Hope to see you back around soon. Alex ShihTalk 22:31, 27 July 2013 (UTC)