Wikipedia:Editor review/Dwayne

Dwayne
I've been here for awhile, and I think it's time for a review on how I edit. So tell me, How's my driving? -  Dwayne   was here! &#9835; 21:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * As stated on my userpage, my primary contributions to Wikipedia are improving all technology & education related articles, reverting vandalism, and last but not least - referencing BLP's. I perform these task because I feel that these parts of the project interest me a little better than some other tasks here on Wikipedia.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Yes, I have been in editing disputes before - None of the disputes nor did any of the users cause me stress, I realize that this is only the internet and that it should not cause any stress to anybody whatsoever. Whenever I run into a dispute, I use patience with the other editors involved in the dispute as I realize that you should always remain civil in discussions.
 * Yes, I have been in editing disputes before - None of the disputes nor did any of the users cause me stress, I realize that this is only the internet and that it should not cause any stress to anybody whatsoever. Whenever I run into a dispute, I use patience with the other editors involved in the dispute as I realize that you should always remain civil in discussions.

 Reviews 


 * I'm not sure if you still care about this, given that half a year's gone by, but just for the record...
 * As far as I can see, you're a reletively quiet, uncontroversial editor. This could be because you aren't as active now as you were when you submitted this, but nevertheless, it's impressive for someone with a fairly high percentage of vandal-fighting edits.  I was very impressed by your interactions here; you certainly did far better in that situation than I would have.
 * Your edit summary usage looks pretty good, not perfect, but nothing to complain too much about either. Your automated edits are about 50% of the total, which isn't in itself a problem right now, but if at any point you were thinking about running for adminship, it could be a source of contention.  If you don't plan on that, I'd say don't worry about automated edits in the slightest; they're essential to vandal-fighting, which is one of your common activities, so not a problem at all.
 * The only major suggestion I have is to work on improving the quality of articles you create. Several of the ones I looked at were unsourced or poorly sourced when you created them (Apple Campus, David Lawrence Jr. K-8 Center, Scott Lake Elementary School, for example), of which several still suffer from referencing problems.  Try to make sure that evrything that's in the article is directly cited to a source.
 * - C628 (talk) 14:52, 1 August 2011 (UTC)