Wikipedia:Editor review/Eleassar

Eleassar
I've been editor since 2005 and administrator since 2008. I'm asking for a general review of my work in the English Wikipedia in the last year and for the review of my communication in the dispute that arose regarding the article Hallstatt culture (see User talk:Dbachmann). I welcome all honest constructive criticism. I'd also like to know where to go next. Eleassar my talk 10:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I've primarily contributed to articles about Slovenia and about medicine. I'm particularly pleased to have greatly contributed to the more coordinated efforts of the editors interested in the Slovenia-related topics (WikiProject Slovenia), of my work related to Ljubljana, of several did-you-know articles, and of several biographies of the Prešeren laureates (e.g. Gojmir Anton Kos, Božidar Jakac, Vitomil Zupan, Alojz Rebula), and to have contributed a presentation about Wikipedia in Slovene-language schools at the Wikimania meeting in Gdansk.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * When I get into editing disputes, I try to resolve things calmly and politely, and resort to the processes available at WP:DISPUTE when necessary.
 * When I get into editing disputes, I try to resolve things calmly and politely, and resort to the processes available at WP:DISPUTE when necessary.

 Reviews 
 * Hi Eleassar, I don't really feel comfortable reviewing an administrator but I will give it my best. I was unable to find the conflict regarding Hallstatt Culture that you mentioned, so I am unable to review your actions there. Looking at your contributions, it seems you should work on your edit summaries; without counting them all, it seems that you only write summaries for roughly 40% of your edits. Looking at Lara-B, it seems that may skimp on the references when you create an article; you could work on adding more references. Your work about Slovenia, as noted by yourself, is exceptional. You seem to be polite with other users and thorough in your explanations, like shown here and here, but may need to work on controlling yourself when approaching the 3RR limit (as suggested here and here), even if it's justified. It is also good to see that you are not afraid to ask other editors for help when you are unsure of something, as shown here. As for where to go next, perhaps you could add references (Slovenian or English) to your created articles that need them or develop some of these articles. Hope that helps. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)