Wikipedia:Editor review/Eyrian2

Eyrian
I've been contributing for a while now, and I feel that I could better serve Wikipedia as an admin. To that end, I would like to see if people think I am ready for that. Eyrian 20:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

 Comments 
 * I'm impressed Eyrian. I think that you have contributed significantly to Wikipedia since you created your account. A quick review of your work on articles, and messages in talk pages shows that you have a knack for page editing, and a disposition toward civility. Your antivandal work is extensive, and your mainspace edits (~3000) are impressive. And I have to give it up to those who use the edit summary as much, and as detailed as you do, it makes it that much easier to explain what an editor was thinking. I hope you'll not think that this review is too generic, but, honestly, I don't find much to complain about. Also, on a side note, I am a huge fan of Image:sandstorm.jpg; had you not nominated it for featured picture, I may never have seen it. I will personally nominate you for admin. whenever you think you are ready (and not just for the picture). - HammerHeadHuman (talk)(work) 18:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I think my rewrite of arrow is probably my favorite contribution. I also think I've done some good work organizing and filling in the gaps in Wikipedia's coverage of medieval armour topics.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've clashed with a few people before, usually when discussing deletion. I try and keep things from escalating by not taking things personally, or making personal remarks. When I see edit wars brewing, I try and take it to talk as quickly as possible, and establish a consensus of what's supposed to happen, based on policy. This is my strategy for doing things in the future.
 * 1) Optional: Though I made it clear that I will support a nomination for your admin'ship (regardless of your answer to this question), how do you feel you could contribute better as an administrator on Wikipedia? (just curious)
 * Since I tend to de-emphasize the more community-oriented features of Wikipedia, I have very few conflicts of interest or social preferences. Thus, I feel I could serve as a highly impartial administrator when it comes to dispute resolution. With the tools at my disposal, I would expand my range as mediator, helping to resolve conflicts well beyond the scope of my current editing.
 * Since I tend to de-emphasize the more community-oriented features of Wikipedia, I have very few conflicts of interest or social preferences. Thus, I feel I could serve as a highly impartial administrator when it comes to dispute resolution. With the tools at my disposal, I would expand my range as mediator, helping to resolve conflicts well beyond the scope of my current editing.

Additional Questions from Dfrg.msc:

Borrowed from, I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not: 


 * 1) CSD1
 * 2) CSD2
 * 3) CSD3
 * 4) CSD4
 * 5) CSD5

Vandalism or or not: 


 * 1)
 * 2)
 * 3)
 * 4)
 * 5)
 * 6)

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)