Wikipedia:Editor review/Fairfieldfencer

Fairfieldfencer
Hello, I'm Fairfieldfencer and I'm 13 years old and enjoy fencing and video gaming. I keep a very watchful eye on my watchlist for vandalism and misinformation. I have adopted a new user to Wikipedia called, Mysterious Nazo and am teaching him the roots of Wikipedia. I have done over 5600 edits. Fair field fencer  F F F  14:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * You are really into Sonic-related articles, good for you! You've picked up a bit of antivandal skills here. Be careful not to appear possessive over your work, collaborative among editors always produce a better result for all. I'm not sure if you intend to eventually run for adminship, but if you do I have two tips for you. First, you need to fill in edit summaries for almost all your edits as a transparent way of informing others what you're doing; Most editors in RfA take this as a requirement. Secondly, perhaps you might want to go in-depth into your topic and consider writing a featured article for Sonic-related articles, as other editors did for games such as Age of Empires and Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater. Happy editing! - Mailer Diablo 16:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You make excellent on-point arguments in AfDs. Keep up the good work!  --A NobodyMy talk 19:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm very proud of the work I've done on the E-123 Omega article in getting it to B-Class. The reason why I'm pleased is because it was my first major edit and it turned out so well.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes I have and I've tried to keep a level head about things and have stopped a couple of edit wars breaking out between others, and I plan to keep a level head like I'm doing now.
 * 1) Additional Question by  - You've been involved in some edit warring before, on pages such as Sonic character.  In that particular case, you then accused User:A Man In Black of vandalism here, in violation of WP:AGF  Would you be willing to assume good faith even if an edit someone made went against how you want an article or template to be?
 * Sometimes. If the edit had notification before it was done then I would have been happier.
 * 1) Additional Question by  - One AFD you were involved heavily in was that for the article on Julie-Su.  It appears that you had some confusion as to what constitutes a third-party reliable source per WP:RS.  Do you believe that you currently do have the correct view on what is a third-party source?
 * Yes. A third-party ref is a source not given by the creators or publishers, but someone involved.
 * 1) Additional Question by  - You've been involved in some AFDs where the debate centers around the use of appropriate sources. Is it ever appropriate to use self-published fan sites and forums to verify an article? When is it appropriate, and when is it inappropriate?
 * Well, perhaps using polls for getting fan-reception wasn't the best idea, but it depends on the subject itself. For example, I recently discovered a fan-forum which is actually run by the head, and only, writer of the Sonic the Hedgehog comic series where he holds Q&As for the fans, so I can ask him anything I want about characters that could help in creation and development sections. I would say in situations like this, where it actually has something offical to it, it is appropriate, but saying something like "Sonic the Hedgehog is the coolest!" in an article after someone posted it on a forum would be inappropriate
 * 1) Additional Question by  - This discussion about the Sega Wikiproject became heated at times. In your own words... what is the difference between a WikiProject and a Task force? Is there ever a reason that a task force would be better than a WikiProject? Or is one clearly superior to the other?
 * Well, I suppose a "project" would seem superior to a "task force" at first glance by someone judging it be name alone. As for it being better, then that would depend entirely on the members who participate in it. You could have a WikiProject that only has a few good members that started a new task force for that WikiProject, and because of how well they've done, people who have seen their edits and respect their skill join up because it's so good. And as for the difference, I would say that a task force is but a small sub-project of a WikiProject that people may not notice, while a WikiProject is a larger and more noticeable group.
 * 1) A message from a special contributor FFF, I request that you check out the Sonic the Hedgehog (tv) series article and evaluate it. 98.24.208.44 (talk) 19:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) A message from a special contributor FFF, I request that you check out the Sonic the Hedgehog (tv) series article and evaluate it. 98.24.208.44 (talk) 19:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)