Wikipedia:Editor review/Falcon8765 (2)

Falcon8765 (2)
I've been a bit introspective regarding my editing habits lately, and as I rarely get feedback I thought this might provide some valuable insight into my contributions. I was just starting out in the previous review of 2+ years ago, and quite a lot has changed since then. If I have made any glaring errors recently, having them pointed out to me so I can work on rectifying them would be helpful.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 08:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I largely do anti-vandalism work. When the mood strikes me however, I'll venture over to Special:NewPages and do some patrolling/tagging/categorizing. I try not to spuriously tag articles for deletion, and would like to think that all of the ones thus tagged were tagged correctly. I have created a couple of stub articles (Norman Albert Mott) but they aren't anything to write home about. Article creation isn't particularly stimulating for me unfortunately.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I was involved in one dispute recently that did annoy me, which is part of the reason I'm seeking this review (Talk:Planned_Parenthood). After trying to explain my position and relevant policies etc. a dispute broke out and I ended up getting a bit annoyed with another editor. Instead of escalating it though, I took a step back and let more patient editors take over.
 * I was involved in one dispute recently that did annoy me, which is part of the reason I'm seeking this review (Talk:Planned_Parenthood). After trying to explain my position and relevant policies etc. a dispute broke out and I ended up getting a bit annoyed with another editor. Instead of escalating it though, I took a step back and let more patient editors take over.

 Reviews