Wikipedia:Editor review/Fayedizard

Fayedizard*
Hello, I just clocked over about 4,000 edits and I'm looking for some particular feedback over a particular subset of these. For the last six months I've been hanging out more and more at the COI board, and that's meant that I've also got involved with some SPI investigations, some blocks, and various new users and some very angry people. Quite often I've felt very over my head and there occasionally times were there are no other uninvolved editors to bounce off. So, I'm looking for a quite specialised review of my handling of cases on these COI archives (along with my work on those articles that were offshoots of these).


 * Archive 56
 * Archive 57
 * Archive 58
 * Archive 59
 * Archive 60 Fayedizard (talk) 09:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I was planning on keeping this very COI focused, but I'm quite proud of managing Stephen Hawking up to an FA article.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * In terms of COI things I've felt could have been handled more properly by me, I feel I may have let more of my irritation show on Optical Express than was wise.
 * In terms of COI things I've felt could have been handled more properly by me, I feel I may have let more of my irritation show on Optical Express than was wise.

 Reviews