Wikipedia:Editor review/Feezo

Feezo
I've been an editor for more than six years, with varying levels of activity. I've tried my hand at most parts of the project, and lately I've found a niche in new page patrol. This has gone very smoothly for the most part&mdash;I've only had one speedy declined, which resulted in a good bit of soul searching and a thorough review of deletion criteria. I've noticed that pages sometimes remain tagged for a surprisingly long time; I'm considering offering myself for adminship so I can assist more directly. Feezo (Talk) 05:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My biggest current project so far is bringing Perl back up to good article (and ideally featured article) status. I've split the language structure section into its own article, and rewritten and added a fair amount of content in the main one.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I was part of the Time Will Say Nothing debacle, and would like feedback on how I handled the situation.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I was part of the Time Will Say Nothing debacle, and would like feedback on how I handled the situation.

 Reviews 
 * OK, I'm back now! :)
 * Antivandalism : I see lots of antivandalism edits and new page patrol, but not a whole load of automated edits. I see that a couple of your CSDs were declined—RfA voters tend to look very badly on that. Also, please remember that when using rollback, you still need to warn the vandal for vandalism using the or the  series of templates.
 * Namespaces : Here I see a wide distribution of edits, which is great! You have good participation in talk space and in project space. You don't have excessive userspace edits, which is also good. Your participation in project talk also shows that you are interested in working with others.
 * Article contributions : You have made a lot of good contributions to Perl, and it appears that you are nearing your first GA! I strongly encourage you to continue working on it and actually get it to GA status. DYKs are another form of article content you can create, and they are easier than GAs. I don't see very many contributions to minor edits like spelling fixes and such. Creating featured content is hard (I haven't made any myself, but I'm working on that), but it really shows dedication.
 * Policy : You have good contributions to a couple AFDs, and one non-admin closure. I would encourage voting and reading more AFDs to get a better understanding of policy.
 * Other comments : I see nothing wrong with how you handled . Also, why don't you request the  privilege here?
 * Overall : I see a great editor here, with only a few minor issues. Perhaps you will have a little mop icon on your userpage in a couple months.
 * Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)