Wikipedia:Editor review/Fltyingpig

Fltyingpig
I have been editing for around six months and I would like to know about what other Wikipedians think of me.  pluma  Ø  04:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions have been reverting vandalism, correcting typos, regulating redlinks, and doing other wikignomish activities
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I got a page I written turned into a redirect page without consensus from an other editor with around 80,000 edits when I was still a signator, but I didn't know what to do about it, so I just got into a big edit-war, but since then I haven't got into any edit wars because I have been pretty timid and wikignomish because of that.

 Reviews 
 * Non-review comment I have moved everything here from Editor review/Thebirdlover where it was improperly added to the end of another editor's review. Monty  845  18:44, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Review by Trevj:
 * Note: Further reviews welcomed. Below is my first ever editor review, so the additional comments of others would be useful, please. Thanks.
 * Userpage is informative and organised.
 * Talk shows civility.
 * Edit summaries are welcomed, but could in some instances be more meaningful, e.g. this could have stated reword: 'to a zoo and some other attractions' -> 'to some atractions like zoos', although this is a matter of personal preference. There's also no need to state "I [...]" because they're your edits we know it's you who's done them!
 * Your fights against vandalism are noted.
 * I hope the above is useful. Happy editing! --Trevj (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Review by Mirokado:
 * My first review too...
 * You are clearly enthusiastic and motivated to make high quality contributions
 * I also noticed the edit summaries but would suggest differently from Trevj: this just illustrates what he said about personal preference. It is excellent that you always provide summaries but they could be a bit less verbose. I don't think there is much point in repeating the content change verbatim, that is what we have diffs for. You could ask yourself "how can I say concisely what I have done and/or why so that a reviewer can decide whether to look at my change in more detail and will know what to expect from a diff?" In the example above, I think "rephrase for neutral POV" would have been fine
 * In addition to any comments here there are also various sections on your talk page which provide ongoing feedback on your contributions. I hope you are "paying attention" to what has been said there
 * You mention one early problem with an edit war. Please don't be discouraged by occasional setbacks like that, they help us to learn, so while being careful to avoid edit warring do not be too diffident either when considering a change you think is necessary.
 * I hope you continue to enjoy editing. --Mirokado (talk) 13:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)