Wikipedia:Editor review/GSK

GSK*
If you've edited a gaming article, chances are, you've seen my name. I'm GSK, which stands for GameShowKid; the connection to GlaxoSmithKline is nothing more than coincidence. Now that I've reached 10,000 edits, I feel that it's time to gain some perspective on how I edit, and how I act with other editors. It's not an excuse, and it's not intended to be an excuse, but I feel that I should disclose that, up until February of this year, I had a deficiency in my body that would cause me to become more irritable than normal, which might explain some of the negative situations I've been in in the past. I've certainly noticed a different collaboration style since February, and I hope others do too, so please take this into account when reviewing. If you don't have a great review for me, all I ask is that you make it as constructive as possible: let me know where I went wrong, and any suggestions you have of correcting it for the future. Thanks, and I look forward to your feedback. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 17:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions are to mostly gaming articles, but I patrol the logs for new pages and new users frequently, and even more frequently file reports at UAA and AIV.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I have been in multiple disputes, which, as I explained a little bit about above, can be attributed to a deficiency that would cause me to experience stress, agitation, and irritability far more quickly than normal. I've personally noticed that I have been involved in far less disputes since correcting this, and that number can only go down in the future.
 * 1) What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?
 * I primarily want feedback on my editing style, how I interact with others, and what I can do to improve this. Since the beginning, I've had a clear plan for how I spend my time on Wikipedia. I wanted to reach at least 10,000 edits, at which point I'd request a review, then I'd use the results of the review to determine whether or not I should file an RFA.

 Reviews