Wikipedia:Editor review/GeneralCheese

GeneralCheese
Hi, Im GeneralCheese, i am a rookie editor. And so far i have been reverting vandalism and i have created 1 article so far. I want to be reviewed because i just want to know how im doing so far. And i want to know what kind of editor i would be in the future.  General  Cheese  21:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions

Optional Questions from Doc Quintana
 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Well my primary contirbs to wikipedia would be fighting vandalism, i love to fight vandalism and i will do everything in my power to keep vandalism off of wikipedia.Soon, i will request to be a rollbacker so i can use more powerful tools like Huggle. 1
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have never been in editing disputes before. I dont recall in being in any.But on my old account which i forgot my username years ago, I was in an editing dispute. Me and this other user was fighting over Compatibilities about Libra and Cancer. I was trying to tell the other user that reasearch said that cancer is in fact compatible with libra. So after a while i just got tired of him and i left the situation alone.
 * I have never been in editing disputes before. I dont recall in being in any.But on my old account which i forgot my username years ago, I was in an editing dispute. Me and this other user was fighting over Compatibilities about Libra and Cancer. I was trying to tell the other user that reasearch said that cancer is in fact compatible with libra. So after a while i just got tired of him and i left the situation alone.
 * 1) Why did you come to Wikipedia, and what do you get out of it? Doc Quintana (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Well, it's hard to judge what kind of an editor you WILL be. One thing I can suggest, though - be careful when reverting IP edits.  I noticed when you reverted this one that you only reverted that IP's second edit, and not the first one as that one should have been reverted also.  Not a big deal as it was dealt with by the next editor, but that's a trap you want to avoid.


 * Another thing that might help you on fighting vandalism is (if you're not already) checking this page - anything that says "tag" at the end bears special attention.


 * Best of luck to ya! ArcAngel (talk) 23:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks for your review. The reason i reverted that page is because i noticed the IP user put an inappropite word on the article, so i feel thats vandalism. -- General  Cheese  02:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * This user should be patient and learn the editing process without using tools first. General Cheese reverted many constructive edits I made to Catherine D. DeAngelis including many new sources and removal of harsh remarks from a blog (WP:BLP and WP:RS). I had a good edit summary for all of my edits. This user is inexperienced and should get more experience before they call everyone's edits vandalism. MiRroar (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I note this user has reverted my comments and left uncivil edit summaries and comments at my talk page. The user also didn't bother to revert the mistaken deletions and admits using multiple accounts. Further behavior like this will be reported. MiRroar (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Excuse me but i made a new account because i forgot my username on the other one. --General Cheese  22:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yet you introduced yourself as a rookie editor? MiRroar (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes because i figured people would not believe i had another account which i forgot my username on.--General Cheese  00:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Template:FormerAccount.  fetch  comms  ☛ 01:25, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Registering an account and actively editing with it are two different things. By the questions you regularly ask at #wikipedia-en-help, I'm doubtful the latter is true. –blurpeace (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * This ER was premature. I suggest continuing your current work, and expanding the areas you contribute to. We will be able to properly review your request in the future. Patience is key. –blurpeace (talk) 11:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Try and write something - I cannot emphasise this enough. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:14, 3 January 2010 (UTC)