Wikipedia:Editor review/GofG

GofG
I have been reverting vandalism exclusively for about one year and one month. I have had very little contact with so called "editors" (I think they're a myth) and I guess I think it might be time to move on to maybe writing articles, or maybe applying for adminship. I honestly have no idea, because I don't know any admins very well. GofG undefinedundefinedundefined Contribs 01:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You seem to have done a lot of great work on Wikipedia so far. Great vandal fighting, and you seem to handle yourself in disputes well.  You haven't spent an inordinate amount of time on your user page, and you have done a decent amount of mainspace edits.  If you want to become an admin I think you'll have to rack up a lot more edits, but other than that, I would say keep up the good work!  I think your idea of moving onto writing more articles is a good one, especially if you would like to pursue adminship.  Verkhovensky 20:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My single article that I've ever written fully. Aubrey Haynie. I didn't know how to do references, so I got my friend User:Commander Keane to do them for me. I uploaded the image myself though, a milestone in my learn-to-use-wikipedia career.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There was the whole User:Shinemygrillz incident. He was basically a new editor who compiled edits amazingly fast. I was one of the ones who always answered his questionable 's. Also, there was an editor on one of the articles I attempted to get involved in. User:Lou franklin basically wanted the word cocksucker removed from the text (it was a quote from a homophobe) under the grounds that it was unnecessarily obscene. I disagreed, and it pretty much snowballed. You can find the argument here.
 * There was the whole User:Shinemygrillz incident. He was basically a new editor who compiled edits amazingly fast. I was one of the ones who always answered his questionable 's. Also, there was an editor on one of the articles I attempted to get involved in. User:Lou franklin basically wanted the word cocksucker removed from the text (it was a quote from a homophobe) under the grounds that it was unnecessarily obscene. I disagreed, and it pretty much snowballed. You can find the argument here.