Wikipedia:Editor review/Gray Porpoise

User:Gray_Porpoise
Good day. I've been a user since May, and would like to know what others think of my progress.

 Reviews 


 * For someone who's been here for less than four months, you've involved yourself far more than usual in contributions to the Wikipedia space, and that's good to see. I'm impressed with your edits in that area especially (and I saw you recently, here), so do continue your good work there. In the meantime, you may wish to consider making large contributions to the article space, which don't necessary have to involve much prose (if you're not confident about it, or aren't interested): there are thousands of articles that need wikification, cleanup, infoboxes and the like, so you might consider joining a WikiProject that interests you and taking a dive into their backlogs. Happy editing in the future, though; you're off to a promising start. RandyWang ( chat me up/fix me up ) 02:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Now that's a user name I immediately recognized (from the sandbox word game). You've been doing a great job here. Many important contributions, and a vast array of needed minor changes.--Hús ö nd 00:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the they that helped me get off to a running start here on wikipedia. Keep up the good work and someone in the future will nominate you for administratorship._-&#2384; S  e  adog  &#2384; 23:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

 Comments  Statistics for: Gray_Porpoise (Permissions: N/A) - Total: 1527 - Main: 628 Talk: 34 User: 202 User talk: 267 Wikipedia: 333 Wikipedia talk: 39 Image: 16 Template: 5 Template talk: 1 Help talk: 2 --- Total edits: 1527 w/ edit summary: 1516 (99.27%*) w/ manual edit summary: 1511 (98.95%*) Minor edits: 186 (12.18%*) First known edit: May 3, 2006 --- ---  Questions
 * Well this user must be doing something right, as it is an admin :D. &mdash; Arjun  20:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I know you got after me once but I think you are doing an awsome job!-JLV
 * See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
 * User's current editing statistics according to Flcelloguy's tool. RandyWang ( chat me up/fix me up ) 02:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * - percentages are rounded down to the nearest hundredth.
 * Generally a positive contributor. --South Philly 14:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am particularly pleased with the stubs I start (a long list which I don't feel like writing down right now) and the articles I've rewritten (Quizilla, which was in complete disorder, Oobi, which was in need of quite a bit of cleanup and expansion, and Fasy, which was a copyright violation). These kinds of things are just what I feel are among the most significant.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I rarely use "Wikipedia" and "stress" in the same sentence. I try to avoid conflicts over editing, and the only noteworthy dispute I've engaged in is Minun's RFAR, and that was by choice. If a conflict arises over editing, my method will be to write up a statement justifying my opinion (and confirming that I understand the other point of view), and avoid arguments that arise.