Wikipedia:Editor review/GroovySandwich

GroovySandwich
I've been around since... 2006, I think. I'm not interested in adminship or anything like that; I haven't been particularly active recently, but I try to edit every so often. Just wanted some insight as to what others think of my editing skills and whatnot Groovy Sandwich  06:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions

Optional Questions from Doc Quintana
 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I used to edit Dragon Ball related articles but now I do mostly minor editing on random articles. I just recently became a more active member of the Disney WikiProject and have been editing various Disney related articles, pages like The Little Mermaid and such. I think I'm doing a good job; I've been adding references and all that good stuff. I usually do minor corrections so yeah.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No disputes recently, but there have been some way back when. I'm not sure if I dealt with those kindsa things with utmost civility but most disputes occurred when I was still new to the wiki and all its rules. I remember there was this user, Whedonette, whom I had a long dispute with over removing some tags or something like that. I think I could've handled it with more civility, but hey, I'm not Captain Planet. I haven't been in any disputes recently; I try to stay frosty. But when I can't stay frosty, I drink Cool-Aid. But seriously, I don't let the wiki stress me out; why should I?
 * No disputes recently, but there have been some way back when. I'm not sure if I dealt with those kindsa things with utmost civility but most disputes occurred when I was still new to the wiki and all its rules. I remember there was this user, Whedonette, whom I had a long dispute with over removing some tags or something like that. I think I could've handled it with more civility, but hey, I'm not Captain Planet. I haven't been in any disputes recently; I try to stay frosty. But when I can't stay frosty, I drink Cool-Aid. But seriously, I don't let the wiki stress me out; why should I?
 * 1) Why did you come to Wikipedia, and what do you get out of it? Doc Quintana (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi GroovySandwich! On to my review...


 * User conduct
 * Edit summaries: You tend to leave informative summaries on most of your edits, both major and minor. This is good, as it means that editors who have the page on their watchlist can see what's happening!
 * Constructive comments on talk pages: Your comments on article talk pages clearly shows someone whose intention is to improve the articles. Even when being critical, you are polite and constructive.
 * Attitude towards others: Pretty much as mentioned above. I can't find much evidence of your attitude in user talk, as most of the edits to that space are either welcomes or vandalism warnings!


 *  Edits
 * Automated Edits: Not much use made of these (6%, mainly using popups) - this means that most of your edits are hand-made, which is a good thing, as you have to think about them that little bit more!
 * Article vs non-article: Just over half of all your edits are to articles, with a bit under 10% on article talk pages. I see no problems with the edits you have made.


 * Summary
 * I see that you were last regularly active back in September 2007 with less than 30 edits per month during the last 9 months (and none in the 15 months before that). As your recent edit count is so low (100 since Apruil 2009), it's hard to say much more!
 * What I do see is a good editor, who I hope will be able to increase the amount of editing they can do on Wikipedia, as I think Wikipedia would be strengthened by that!


 * I hope this helps. Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)