Wikipedia:Editor review/Gtstricky

Gtstricky
Hello all. I am a newer user but have been active over the past few months. I would love some critique of my work. I would like to improve my edits and would like some advice in that area. Thanks in advance.  Gtstricky Talk or C 17:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi, after 2 months, it seems that you're a great vandal fighter! Thanks for your efforts, they are much appreciated by the whole community... That said, there are a couple issues that could use improvement in my opinion (in no particular order):
 * Please endeavor to always use edit summaries (e.g., , , , )
 * Try to always remember WP:BITE, even when encountering obvious vandalism. An example of this is your message on User talk:Gnurpen. Although this is a matter of opinion, I think you should have escalated it up through the warning templates. People like this can usually be rehabilitated, which would be better for the project.
 * On the other hand, re: User talk:Lazertazer, again it's a matter of opinion, but I would have reported him to WP:AIV, as he'd already received a final warning.
 * Other than that, it looks great so far! How about getting involved in some of the wikignome projects, such as WP:DEP, WP:DPL, and other tasks that have backlogs? Happy editing! :-) --Storkk (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


 * All great points. Thank you very much for your time you took to do the review.  Gtstricky Talk or C 21:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I have been involved in vandal reverts. That has probably been my biggest contribution to date. I have also tried to get involved in AFD discussions (great place to read and learn also).
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * This AFD had the potential but I can let the group do the talking and not let it get personal. I find that as long as you look at things from other peoples POV and respect their opinion it can all be worked out. Then again I tend to stay away from highly polarizing articles (politics, religion etc).
 * This AFD had the potential but I can let the group do the talking and not let it get personal. I find that as long as you look at things from other peoples POV and respect their opinion it can all be worked out. Then again I tend to stay away from highly polarizing articles (politics, religion etc).