Wikipedia:Editor review/Hirohisat 2

Hirohisat
Hello, I have decided to create another editor review following my first once since some people (and they were experienced editors) have seen some problem with my edits. I would like to get a feed back on my conduct and points to improve if possible. Thanks to people who participate in advance! -- Hirohisat Kiwi 06:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello, Hirohisat. Firstly, the rfa thing is only minor; it should not bother you so much. Just be sure not to do it again :-) Now, on to my review. I think you're a great editor. You are always very civil and willing to help out. I suggest you stay away from RfA for a while and focus on your mainspace editing, as it is really weak. You haven't touched the mainspace in 5 days. Editing the mainspace is a great experience, and the reward (the knowledge that someone, somewhere is going to be using that information to expand his/her knowledge and help the world) is worth all the hard work that comes with creating and fixing articles. I suggest you start by checking WP:RA and handling requests at WP:AFC. After you think you have enough mainspace experience and knowledge of policies and guidelines such as WP:BLP, WP:LEAD and WP:MOS, you can start participating with Good Articles and Good Article candidates. Keep up the good work! -- Ag  ü  eybaná  18:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about the RfA close. I've moved Shimane up to B class. Dekimasu よ! 17:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Forget it. Anyone who runs a cabal is bound to be a bad admin. You edit count is OK, but nothing else. You might as well forget about it until you either renounce the Earth Cabal or put it up for an MfD. There you are. Laleena  00:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Hirohisat. I think the fuss over external links on Teratoma illustrates where you have room for improvement.  A user called "helpme" and you jumped right in to help, which is commendable, but I think you did not pause long enough to reflect on what help the user should receive.  You allowed yourself to be led (and perhaps misled) by the user.  I think the user probably is a novice, but the user is in bad company:  multiple new accounts, anonymous posters, incivil posters, vandals, some blocks, and maybe sock puppets too.  Did you examine any user contributions and page histories before you jumped in to help?  --Una Smith 15:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My best contributions would be to Shimane Prefecture which I have got it up from a stub to a start class, and has a possiblity for B-Class. Other than that I work mainly on WikiProject Trains in Japan mostly.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * My recent closure of Betacommand's second Rfa caused a stir since I wasn't a sysop. That drew some critisism and I decided to have this ER. I personally don't know how to deal with a Rfa that was supposed to be closed and is closed, so my plan is to start another editor review. As for my future conduct...it will depend on the feed back I get here :) -- Hirohisat Kiwi 07:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * My recent closure of Betacommand's second Rfa caused a stir since I wasn't a sysop. That drew some critisism and I decided to have this ER. I personally don't know how to deal with a Rfa that was supposed to be closed and is closed, so my plan is to start another editor review. As for my future conduct...it will depend on the feed back I get here :) -- Hirohisat Kiwi 07:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)