Wikipedia:Editor review/I

I
Hey. I've been here since March 3. I've made around 1500 edits. I would just like to know how I'm doing. Specifically: are there concerns about my civility? Someone previously said I was incivil, but I didn't think I was. I'd like a larger audience to tell me if I really was. Secondly, if there are concerns about my username. I changed it, but now people are concerned about single letter names, and mine is especially difficult, as its hard to refer to me. I don't think I've been in any conflicts neccesarily, or anything I would classify as a conflict. Any critiques and comments are welcome. i (said)  (did) 23:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * I feel that 'i' has made some good edits on WP. I would not say that 'i' is uncivil at all, but direct and by the book.  I am new to WP.  When I first started a month ago, I thought it was like MySpace, where you make a page for yourself and write articles or biographies about things/people that interest you.  'i' taught me about fun things like 'notability' and the 'AFD' vote process.  I quickly learned that there were several rules that I had never heard of on WP.  Even when I challenged 'i' or complained, 'i' was direct and fair, never holding grudges, and never talking down to my inexperience.  Because of i's feedback, I have gone back and read much of the WP rules and regulations.  If 'i' is not already an admin, 'i' would make a good one.  Much thanx for the continued help. IsraelXKV8R 01:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel that you are doing quite well - you are a regular at several good project space pages, such as WP:RFCN and WP:USURP, among others (such as RFA (yes?)). Also - good article work. You get quite a few extra points for being a fan (I'm assuming) of the Keys to the Kingdom series ;) -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm proud of my work on the Keys to the Kingdom and articles surrounding that. The character page was a mess, and I really enjoyed fixing it up. Also, I've tried to help in getting episode articles that aren't notable removed. I hope to help get an article to GA or FA soon.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I don't think I've had conflict neccesarily. Differing of opinions but not a conflict. I think I would be able to handle them well, and respectfully, because it's not a huge deal. Nothing to lose sleep over. And if it was really affecting me, take a break from it and ask someone else to step in with a third opinion or to mediate.
 * 1) Please provide a diff showing the edit with the alleged incivility. --Richard 07:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You'll notice that during these discussion I posted as Alcemáe until I talked to Ursasapien on his talk page, by which time I had changed my username.
 * There were three edits on a TfD discussion that started it:     Shortly thereafter, User:Ursasapien correctly decided that we were getting off-topic, and moved the discussion to my talk page. Here is the discussion. A while later, in another discussion about episode articles, he made some mention about him feeling as if he had been the victim of inciviliy and persecution. I asked him about this, specifically in relation to action on my part, on his talk page. This is the discussion. Since then, I've tried to address some of the specific concerns Ursasapien brought up.
 * You'll notice that during these discussion I posted as Alcemáe until I talked to Ursasapien on his talk page, by which time I had changed my username.
 * There were three edits on a TfD discussion that started it:     Shortly thereafter, User:Ursasapien correctly decided that we were getting off-topic, and moved the discussion to my talk page. Here is the discussion. A while later, in another discussion about episode articles, he made some mention about him feeling as if he had been the victim of inciviliy and persecution. I asked him about this, specifically in relation to action on my part, on his talk page. This is the discussion. Since then, I've tried to address some of the specific concerns Ursasapien brought up.

A Little Test

Borrowed from who borrowed it from I hope neither of them will mind. Just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not: 


 * 1) CSD1- I would merge it to The_X_Factor_UK_and_Ireland_series_3
 * 2) CSD2- I would redirect it to the already existing Voip.com article.
 * 3) CSD3- I probably wouldn't SD it because of a few mentions, such as this one. So I'd either prod it, or AfD.
 * 4) CSD4- Speedy delete under G1 or G3.
 * 5) CSD5- Speedy delete under A7. No Google hits for "Q band" "Q Nicola Packett" or their supposed fully released album, "Angel Q Band".

Vandalism or or not: 

Yamaka122 ... :)   14:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) - Not vandalism, but misguided test edits with POV.
 * 2) - Yes.
 * 3) - Yes.
 * 4) - No, because the meme is common, and someone unfamiliar with WP would put it on in good faith. There was discsussion about mentioning the meme on the talk page going on while that comment was inserted here, but it was the users first edit, and so would probably not have known to check the talk page for discussion. The user did not participate in the discussion, so it was not in bad faith going against consensus.
 * 5) - No, a user who did not understand the MOS.
 * 6) - No, a good faith insertation of cruft.