Wikipedia:Editor review/Immunize

Immunize
Would like to find ways to improve. Immunize (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to wikipedia are those related to reverting vandalism, however, I also frequently comment at RfA's, tag pages for speedy deletion, and, with some frequency, comment at or start deletion discussions. 1
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have not been in any major conflicts with other editors except for a single problem that occured some time ago, which involved a IP removing ClueBot warnings. As I was patrolling recent changes, I assumed that this IP's edits were vandalism and reverted the edits that blanked the warnings. However, I later learned that the editor was actually blanking out warnings that had been given in error. 2
 * I have not been in any major conflicts with other editors except for a single problem that occured some time ago, which involved a IP removing ClueBot warnings. As I was patrolling recent changes, I assumed that this IP's edits were vandalism and reverted the edits that blanked the warnings. However, I later learned that the editor was actually blanking out warnings that had been given in error. 2

 Reviews 

Review by PrincessofLlyr

Here are my comments after looking over your userspace and contributions. Really, other than trying to expand the articles you start, everything looks fine. You're doing a terrific job here. Any questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. PrincessofLlyr royal court 01:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Great vandalism work! That's always a good place to work.
 * Good job creating articles, but several of them seem to be stubs, one only a single sentence. Maybe you should work on expanding them?
 * I'm impressed that you chose to come back after your RfA. That can be a really nasty experience and very discouraging, but not every major editor has to be an admin. There's a lot to do even without those extra tools.
 * Your RfA !votes seem good, as are your deletion nominations/discussions.
 * CSD tags all fine.
 * Good balance between article and talk page contributions. Same with automated/non-automated edits.
 * Good edit summary usage.
 * You could try to get more involved in various projects around the community outside of vandalism patrol, but that's really up to you. If you're interested, but want ideas, feel free to ask. I can think of several places that could use more help.

Hello, I'd like to make some comments here as I didn't want to go on too much at your RFA. I'd like to ask you a couple of questions first if you don't mind. This is purely to help you, not to pick holes in your contributions, so if you don't feel like going down this route, that's absolutely fine. Also, feel free to wait until your RFA is over. I realise that you may not feel too good about thinkgs if your RFA is unsuccessful, so I want to emphasize that any comments I make will be to help you.
 * Review by Belovedfreak

Answer:As you know, I am not a prolific content contributor. However, I have written several (12 or 13, I believe) articles, including Brain metastases, Neurooncology, Burnt Meadow Mountain, and several others. I did create several Lists of causes of... articles (Including list of causes of fever and list of causes of abdominal pain) which I once hoped could become featured lists, but since consensus has emerged that these lists are not useful, and one was deleted and the rest were userfied. Immunize (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC) -- Beloved Freak  14:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) I've looked over your problem with User:Riffraffselbow, and I remember it happening at the time. What, if anything do you feel you've learned from the experience? Have you learned anything policy-related, or about how you might act differently in the future?
 * 2) What do you think are your best content-related contributions (not related to vandalism)? This is not to have a go, I know you haven't written any FAs, and that's fine. I just want to get a grasp of what you think of any content-related contributions.