Wikipedia:Editor review/J04n

J04n
Hello, I'm looking to be reviewed because I feel that constructive feedback is essential to improving ones skills. J04n(talk page) 02:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * I am perhaps not the best person to review you because of the closeness of our working areas (and the fact we have exchanged barnstars!) but I think you deserve a word or two. As far as #1 goes: your workrate is phenomenal in what you do for disambiguation; your work on the band articles is of a high standard. With #2, your attitude and approach is exemplary. With regards to the user in question, there isn't much else you could do – quite often they don't respond on their talk page, but at least you tried. And that is the point, you seem to want to do things the right way, and you are succeeding so far. But... there isn't a "but"... yet. But (oops, there it is) if I come across anything, I'm sure you wouldn't mind me letting you know! – B.hotep •talk• 10:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually came through here because I was wondering if you had thought about going through a request for adminship. I'm not an expert on RfA nominations (I've only ever nominated myself), but if you'd ever like a nomination statement, let me know and write one up for you. It seems to me you have all the things on your resume that people are looking for–article work, janitorial work, good communication with other editors, continuous activity, and no worries that you'd delete the main page. Dekimasu よ! 07:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I believe that my contributions to Black Sabbath significantly helped it to become a WP:GA, I greatly improved Dio (band). I do a lot of disambiguating.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A particular editor continuously used POV info to populate the Voice Type in the Template:Infobox Musical artist. I started the following discussion about it and summarized the conclusion on the talk pages of the articles and then reverted them.  The issue continued and I added this to his talk page, which received no comment.  I now revert, with explanation, these additions to the pages that I regularly edit, but don't go out of my way to find others that he adds these to.  In general I drop a line on someone's talk page if I believe conflict will arise.
 * A particular editor continuously used POV info to populate the Voice Type in the Template:Infobox Musical artist. I started the following discussion about it and summarized the conclusion on the talk pages of the articles and then reverted them.  The issue continued and I added this to his talk page, which received no comment.  I now revert, with explanation, these additions to the pages that I regularly edit, but don't go out of my way to find others that he adds these to.  In general I drop a line on someone's talk page if I believe conflict will arise.