Wikipedia:Editor review/Jorcoga

User:Jorcoga
I would appreciate some feedback about my editing. I think Wikipedia is great and all websites should be wiki. Anyway, Thankyou if you comment!  J o r c o g α  09:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Hello there. Well, my first and immediate impression is that your flow of contributions is too scant. Although you've been around for 8 months, you have less than 900 edits and seldom make more than 10 edits a day (with many days with no edits at all). This would make it virtually impossible for you to become an administrator as of this stage. But of course, if you do not desire to become an administrator, you don't have to worry about that. At the same time, I see that you participate in administrative-oriented tasks, such as AfDs, RfAs and vandal-fight. Likewise, your participation and experience in these areas would have to grow exponentially before any RfA attempt. Now, off to non-admin areas. You've made some mainspace contributions, but like you say, not too many. You may try searching for a WikiProject or Portal about something that interests you. You're already a member of WikiProject The Simpsons but you could definitely get more involved. If you feel like you're not into article building, then you may always help with tasks such as stub sorting or categorization. It's commendable that you haven't been involved in any conflict, but that's not surprising considering your low edit count. In short: increase your participation on Wikipedia in all areas, in order to better enjoy your involvement in this rewarding/enriching project. One last note, your edit summary usage is much below expectations. Try to always provide an edit summary for your contributions. Frequent users of WP are expected at least 95% of edit summary usage. I hope this was helpful. Happy editing! Regards.-- Hús  ö  nd  02:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

One last think, if is your account, you should put User Alt Acct Master in your main account, and User Alternate Acct (as in  in the user page of, to let others know this fact. It is not wrong to have alternate accounts if they are used correctly and marked as secondary accounts. I won't suggest you to participate more as Husond. If you are happy working at your own pace, then there is no need for trying to increase it. Wikipedia is a very interesting experiment, but which can become pretty stressing. The trick (one I know but should remember from time to time) is to not spend here more than the necessary time. Otherwise, you may end up editing at 5 AM, four hours before an important exam! Real case ;-) Good luck! -- ReyBrujo 03:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello Jorcoga, how are you doing? Since Husond did most of the comments, I will just point a couple of things. First, as mentioned, your edit summary is pretty low. Summaries are pretty useful for everyone, since it allows you to quickly locate revisions by looking at the page history. While it is true you don't have a lot of contributions, I notice you have quite a lot of edits in the Wikipedia namespace, through opinions in the different request for adminship, and the user talk namespace, especially through Esperanza messages. I see a few vandalism reverts. This one could have been interpreted as a test2 or as a verror instead of a test3, considering the user had done only one edit before it, although I am sure you would find several other opinions about it. You have participated in a lot of RFAs, although you have opposed very few ones. Personally, I did not like that you took into account a candidate's faulty english, that was unnecessary. However, along with Betacommand RFA, they are just some of the few times where you did not go with the "majority". Just wondering, do you review the user's contributions, check what they had done, or just base your opinion in the edit count, the answer and the previous opinions?

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I created List of Magarey Medallists, which isn't great, but I'm not really an article writing person.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * By some miracle, I actually haven't.
 * By some miracle, I actually haven't.