Wikipedia:Editor review/Jorgath

Jorgath
First off, I do not want to be an admin; this is not a prelude to an RfA. I was on Wikipedia 5 years ago, and my interest quickly faded. I came back about 6 months ago and have started really enjoying myself and getting involved. I'd like to get other opinions on what I've been doing right and wrong, though. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 19:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to Wikipedia are creating airport stubs for small but technically notable airports, new page patrolling, volunteering at the dispute resolution noticeboard, commenting at WP:AN/I, and working on baseball-related pages. Lately, I've also worked on a few current events articles. I'm especially pleased with my DRN work and 2012 Washington Nationals season. I'm also pleased with the work I've done in collaboration on 2012 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I've been in a couple of editing disputes, but they've been confined to talk pages on contentious articles such as Luka Magnotta and 2012 Aurora shooting. I've gotten stressed in a few AN/I discussions, too, and once or twice at User talk:Jimbo Wales. I generally handle it well, I think; I might get a little irritable, but I try to stick to talking about policies and guidelines, apologize if I cross a line, and disengage if necessary.
 * I've been in a couple of editing disputes, but they've been confined to talk pages on contentious articles such as Luka Magnotta and 2012 Aurora shooting. I've gotten stressed in a few AN/I discussions, too, and once or twice at User talk:Jimbo Wales. I generally handle it well, I think; I might get a little irritable, but I try to stick to talking about policies and guidelines, apologize if I cross a line, and disengage if necessary.

 Reviews 


 * I've taken a look into your discussion history on adminship reforms as well as some of the comments in 2012 Aura shooting. I agree that you may not seem to be at your best mood in some of the disputes, but you have managed to stay civil and logical at all times. Your approach in dispute resolution noticeboard seem to be even better, referencing to policies and working on getting consensus.


 * It appears that you are maintaining a nice balance between working on articles of your interest and working on Wikipedia issues that concern you at the same time. I don't think there is anything wrong that you are doing. Good editor, great work. Alex ShihTalk 05:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)