Wikipedia:Editor review/Jprw

Jprw
Just would like some feedback on what I'm doing right and areas for improvement Jprw (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi Jprw, sorry for the delay in getting a review done for you - as you'll see, we've got a bit of a backlog at the moment! Anyway, on with the show...


 * Conduct:
 * When you use edit summaries, they are very precise and clear - which is great. However, there are some where you don't use a summary, and these stand out because of the others! It's not really a problem though (88% of all major edits and 90% of all minor edits have an edit summary)
 * Your interactions with other users (both on user talk pages and article talk pages) is useful - you obviously believe in communications rather than arguments! However, there were a few comments you made that struck me as possibly sarcastic or argumentative - but these were very much in a minority - most of the comments I looked at were supportive and helpful.
 * Editing:
 * Firstly, good work on the The Witch Who Came From the Sea and The Broken Compass: How British Politics Lost its Way articles! Also, good work on your attempts to tidy up and stream-line the Alice Cooper article.
 * The edits you are making are definitely aimed at improving the encyclopedia! Almost 92% of your edits were on articles, with almost another 7% on article talk pages!
 * Summary:
 * A good start to your editing career here on Wikipedia! Well done, and keep up the good work --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 18:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Alice Cooper
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, I have been in disputes. In order for a dispute not to get out of hand, the trick is to always consider responses carefully
 * Yes, I have been in disputes. In order for a dispute not to get out of hand, the trick is to always consider responses carefully