Wikipedia:Editor review/Judicatus

Judicatus
Would like to know what to improve, always room for improvement afterall. Judicatus | Talk | Contributions 04:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Judicatus, you're doing fine on Wikipedia, especially script-related work. This is good, however, you should expose yourself to other areas of Wikipedia (not just editing articles [without the script]), but on areas like WP:XFD, WP:RFA, or even here at WP:ER. I also like the way you resolved and avoid conflicts. Keep up the good work and I hope you take my suggestions.-- T ru  c o   00:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Mainly wikification, and content improvement in general to articles. The single article I am pleased with would be Steven Rooke, in terms of raw improvement. However, it needs more lovin'.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No conflicts thus far, but knowing me, I would probably keep trying to resolve it through direct resolution if it is a conflict, resorting to dispute resolution would feel like giving up on a peaceful outcome. If stressed to the point of disruption to personal judgment, I would end up taking a break until 'wikistable'
 * No conflicts thus far, but knowing me, I would probably keep trying to resolve it through direct resolution if it is a conflict, resorting to dispute resolution would feel like giving up on a peaceful outcome. If stressed to the point of disruption to personal judgment, I would end up taking a break until 'wikistable'