Wikipedia:Editor review/Judicatus (2)

Judicatus
Would like to do work with administrator tools to help out when I see the opportunity to. My prior edit count history being so erratic is due to college. My reason for return is a friend of mine showed me an issue on an article which he thought was grammatically incorrect and sent me a link: voila! I am back. I would like to be reviewed here for advice prior to any RFA, considering my current edit counts and very recent activity I highly doubt an RFA would give me any advice or possibility of passing, most likely being WP:NOTNOW'd down. Judicatus | Talk 02:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Originally I contributed a bit more in the article space with what I considered cheerfully to be substantial, I look back now and laugh a bit over it. I did a lot of script work in the past, messed around again with them recently, still fresh in my mind apparently. The current work I am attempting is in the backspace of Wikipedia; maintenance tasks and possibly AFD in the future, although I do not see AFD as a high point in anyone's wiki life considering the possible damage to editors well intentioned contributions, leading to WP:BITE.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * No disputes I can remember (Note: Found one, albeit old). In the physical world I deal with discussions constantly in danger of escalation (conference room honors classes with topics: Race, Religion, Etc.) and tend to calm the discussions before said escalation. I implore editors to use civility and WP:AGF as textual discourse can leave the imagination to perceive many threats and sarcasms out of the scope of reality. I deal with any stress on Wikipedia and any frustration by trying to think of a way to get everyone coordinated and, that failing, to compromise as much as possible without harming the project (Wikipedia). I have a previous editor review for anyone interested, here is the link.
 * No disputes I can remember (Note: Found one, albeit old). In the physical world I deal with discussions constantly in danger of escalation (conference room honors classes with topics: Race, Religion, Etc.) and tend to calm the discussions before said escalation. I implore editors to use civility and WP:AGF as textual discourse can leave the imagination to perceive many threats and sarcasms out of the scope of reality. I deal with any stress on Wikipedia and any frustration by trying to think of a way to get everyone coordinated and, that failing, to compromise as much as possible without harming the project (Wikipedia). I have a previous editor review for anyone interested, here is the link.

 Reviews 


 * Hi there. It appears that you are on an extended wikibreak at the moment. Although I wouldn't blame you since your request was made over a year ago.

It's difficult to give you an thorough review because you have only been active for three months in the three years (on separate occasions, each being spread a year apart). I know college life is hard, but if you are ever considering for adminship, continuous activity for a minimum of 6 months would probably be necessary.

You haven't really written any articles yet. See here on how to write better articles to get you started. If you can stay active and contribute to different parts of Wikipedia on more consistent basis, you will be on the right path. Alex ShihTalk 22:12, 26 July 2013 (UTC)