Wikipedia:Editor review/Kermanshahi

Kermanshahi
I'd like to see what I can do to become a better user on wikipedia and to see if I'm doing anything wrong, what I'm doing wrong and how I can improve. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC).

 Reviews 


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed two things that stand out. First, you do not use edit summaries all of the time. Please go to "my preferences" and click on the "editing" tab and check off the last option. This will make you make edit summaries, which are very important. Next, understandably English is not your native language, however, there are a few grammatical errors in your edits, but I can not hold that against you. I hope you enjoy Wikipedia. Oh, I just remembered, you wondered why no one was reviewing you. That is because you did not list your editor review on the list. Best of luck in all of your edits! Wishes, wpktsfs 02:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello Kermanshahi. I think the most important thing I have noticed in your mainspace edits is a tendancy to flatter Iran.  In particular the List of countries by number of total troops.  The list title itself sounds like a statistical gimmick designed solely to ensure Iran has a list on which they will be the lead.  You have jealously protected the article against attempts to place Iran below the top position and almost gloated after you restored or protected Iran's #1 ranking, one time saying, "Well I'm glad this argument is over and Iran just stays on top".  I commend you for discussing changes, but in those discussions you seem to create arbitrary distinctions between Iran's "paramilitary" made primariliy of individuals who are only members because they can fight and all other countries' "civilian defense forces".  Another problem I have with that same article is the fact that you seem to have taken ownership of the article and you've added it to the Wikipedia Military History Project, then you re-inforced a "B" rating for the article that was placed there by a discredited, banned editor.


 * I sense similar bias in another of your new articles, Operation Kheibar. I think the article has too much POV and some of it almost sounds like propoganda, like, "the only thing that saved [the Iranian troops] was the fact that they had so many soldiers that where all eager to fight out of loyalty to their nation".


 * In Wikipedia, we're asked to put aside our allegiances and focus only on the facts, even if those facts cast an unflattering shadow on those things we hold sacred. I wish you luck in you edits.  --JJLatWiki 01:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * With my artickles: List of countries by number of total troops, Operation Undeniable Victory, Operation Karbala-6. But I am pleased with all of them only I consider these my best ones.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have been falsely accused twice of being a sockpuppeteer because of other users where I had contact with had sockpuppets. Good jod both times I was unblocked and I could contribute to
 * I have been falsely accused twice of being a sockpuppeteer because of other users where I had contact with had sockpuppets. Good jod both times I was unblocked and I could contribute to