Wikipedia:Editor review/Killervogel5

Killervogel5
I began life as a Wikipedian almost 2 and a half years ago, but only really became a serious editor over the six months. Since then, I have thrown myself into Wikipedia wholeheartedly, perhaps more than I should, but that's simply because I want to help the Internet not suck, just like the rest of you. I suppose it's selfish to want a review simply for personal reasons, but I would like to get feedback from the community on how I am doing as an editor. KV5 •  Squawk box  •  Fight on!  16:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Very good quality edits. I would suggest to broaden your horizon and start editing other articles that is not baseball related. There are other things that need help on this Wiki too. Overall, you are one good Wikipedian. Leujohn ( talk, How did I do? ) 09:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Being the coordinator of WP:PHILLIES, I find myself working in those articles quite a lot. I did a rebuild of Philadelphia Phillies seasons and got it to featured list status nearly singlehandedly, with the help of my wonderful reviewers, of course. I have been adding as many references as I can find to Philadelphia Phillies, with an eventual goal of WP:GA. I also did a complete rebuild of Philadelphia Baseball Wall of Fame. Outside of the Phillies, I have been a major contributor to the Wiki of my former employer, Edgewood High School, and started to put together a Wiki for the district (Harford County Public Schools) as well, but have not had much time to work on it and since I am no longer employed there, I no longer have access to much of the information that was available to me before.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There have been a few times when I felt stressed by other editors; however, I have always been a proponent of trying to talk it out through consensus, as all editors should be. I feel that Wikipedia has actually become a stabilizing influence for me, because I now find myself following Wikipolicy in my everyday life. I am bolder, but I still work toward finding consensus with friends, family, and co-workers. If I become stressed by the Wiki, I have found myself taking a day-long (perhaps two) Wikibreak, but I find that I really don't need (or want!) such a break, because I have such fun doing this.
 * There have been a few times when I felt stressed by other editors; however, I have always been a proponent of trying to talk it out through consensus, as all editors should be. I feel that Wikipedia has actually become a stabilizing influence for me, because I now find myself following Wikipolicy in my everyday life. I am bolder, but I still work toward finding consensus with friends, family, and co-workers. If I become stressed by the Wiki, I have found myself taking a day-long (perhaps two) Wikibreak, but I find that I really don't need (or want!) such a break, because I have such fun doing this.