Wikipedia:Editor review/Kirachinmoku

Kirachinmoku
Id like to be reviewed as after taking lots of peoples advice on how to improve myself as an editor i have reached a point where i would still like to improve but am unsure as to how.  Kira Chinmoku  ( T, ¤ ) 00:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions are making anti-vandal edits by use of the Huggle tool as well as the Rollback permissions. I also use HotCat to add and remove categories to articles and Friendly to welcome newcomers.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have only ever been in 2 or 3 disputes over edits, these have normally been caused by a difference in opinion. The disputes have never caused me stress and have been resolved quickly, normally due to one or other of the persons involved either seeing that they are wrong, or proving that the other person is wrong.
 * I have only ever been in 2 or 3 disputes over edits, these have normally been caused by a difference in opinion. The disputes have never caused me stress and have been resolved quickly, normally due to one or other of the persons involved either seeing that they are wrong, or proving that the other person is wrong.

 Reviews 


 * R1 You appear to be another up-and-coming editor who is doing much good in the community. The following are a few suggestions for improvement:


 * OptIn for the edit counter so that others may properly review your history. (I was unable to do so and have only been able to evaluate you according to random searches in your contributions.)
 * Be sure to provide an edit summary for every edit you make. This aids others in understanding your rationale for the edit and can save them time when checking their watchlist.
 * Act upon the advice already given you in your past RfAs. The suggestion to gain more experience in content contribution (as opposed to critiquing) seems especially valid to me. Get an article to GA status and then conduct some GANs of your own, and I think you'll be surprised at how much you learn.


 * Hope this helps! —Eustress talk 14:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)