Wikipedia:Editor review/Ko2007

Ko2007
I just want to be reviewed!! **Ko2007**  04:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

You have made several newbie mistakes, which I will point out and recommend that you improve: I wish you good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shalom (talk • contribs)
 * 1) You created Requests for adminship/Ko2007 and Requests for adminship/ko2007.  I have tagged both pages for deletion because you are not ready to become a Wikipedia administrator.  Generally, you need a minimum of three months and 2,000 edits before you are likely to pass the requests for adminship process.  If you are interested in maintaining the encyclopedia by deleting inappropriate pages and blocking vandals, I suggest you learn the ropes at Admin coaching.
 * 2) You voted three times and misunderstood the central issues at Articles for deletion/Battles in Harry Potter, which was deleted despite your opinion to keep it.  You can learn about the critical issues that govern deletion debates by reading about policies such as notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view.
 * 3) You have focused mainly on Harry Potter articles.  You may wish to look at the Harry Potter WikiProject.
 * 4) You should consider editing other articles.  See the community portal (link on the left sidebar) for ideas.

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My Harry Potter edits are usually very good, i have added good sections to Order of the Phoenix (organisation) and others .....
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, but I realized I was wrong and apologized and if I was right well then I was.
 * Yes, but I realized I was wrong and apologized and if I was right well then I was.