Wikipedia:Editor review/Krazycev13

Krazycev13
Hello, this is my review board. Please leave any recommendations and/or comments on my work as an editor to Wikipedia on this page. Any feedback would be much obliged. -- ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV 13  other crap 00:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Well, I usually edit music or video game articles, mostly with high vandalism rates (such as Hollywood Undead and Left 4 Dead). I sometimes edit articles about musicians, but everything I do is in the scope of music or gaming.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, actually. I've been in disputes before. However, I've never broken 3RR (although I've very nearly done so). Users aren't usually the ones who cause me stress, though. It's mostly IP addresses. The way I handle it: I'll warn the IP and attempt reasoning with them. If they continue, I repeat. Then I'll request an administrator's aid. I try to avoid edit warring, and haven't started one yet. I don't plan to. If a user starts to stress me out or I start a dispute, I will talk to them on their talk page. If that doesn't work, I will also request administrator intervention.
 * Yes, actually. I've been in disputes before. However, I've never broken 3RR (although I've very nearly done so). Users aren't usually the ones who cause me stress, though. It's mostly IP addresses. The way I handle it: I'll warn the IP and attempt reasoning with them. If they continue, I repeat. Then I'll request an administrator's aid. I try to avoid edit warring, and haven't started one yet. I don't plan to. If a user starts to stress me out or I start a dispute, I will talk to them on their talk page. If that doesn't work, I will also request administrator intervention.

 Reviews 
 * Hey, Krazycev13! I will be reviewing you today.  I am happy with your response about edit-warring/disputes.  What you will do if you are in a dispute is a great method.  I am impressed on you hard work which is shown in the articles Hollywood Undead and Left 4 Dead.  Wow!  Your article count is high—77.68% of all your edits to be exact.  That is very good.  I see that you have made a lot of redirects.  That will be very helpful to the people who are trying to look something up but have to search for it.  I see that you have created around 15 articles.  You would probably be good at creating Wikipedia articles about games or other albums you know about that aren't on Wikipedia.  I think you have a pretty solid knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, due to the fact that most of your edits are edits to articles and only 1.29% of your total edits are automated.  I see that you sometimes forget to type an edit summary for each edit you make.  That is very important because it is a short description of what you have changes.  The good thing about creating a new article is that it might be featured on the main page.  Under the Do You Know? section.  Keep up the good work!  Btilm  03:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Krazycev13, sorry for the delay in getting a review for you - we're slowly catching up with the backlog! You wait 3 weeks for a review, and then 2 come along at the same time!


 * User conduct
 * Edit summaries: only about 2/3 of your edits have edit summaries. Edit summaries make it easier for people who are watching a particular page to know what is happening - and to decide whether it might be vandalism!
 * Constructive comments on talk pages: The comments that you leave on article pages are directed towards improving the encyclopedia - discussing sources and names. I don't always agree with all your redirect/merge suggestions
 * Attitude towards others:You generally seem friendly, and supportive towards you on-wiki friends. I don;t really see any problems here.


 * Edits
 * Automated Edits: 51 edits (1.29%) using Twinkle, which seems to be accurately used
 * Article vs non-article: Most of your edits (almost 78%) are to articles. I see a lot of redirects that you have created for the same article (for example Dr. Shavargo, Pt. 3, Dr. Shavargo, Pt 3, Dr. Shavargo Pt 3, Dr Shavargo, Pt 3, Dr Shavargo Pt 3)


 * Other
 * It is good to see that you have been adopted by Twilight Helryx - having someone else to guide you can help to make you an ever better editor!
 * It is also good to see that you were granted Rollback, and have been using it sensibly!


 * Summary
 * I think you are doing fine. Continue with the work you are doing on music- and game-related articles, keep doing vandalism patrol, etc. Also try to remember that IPs are human too! While about 80% of all vandalism is done by IP addresses, 82% of all edits done by IPs are not vandalism (i.e. 18% of the IP edits accounts for 80% of the vandalism!) Many editors choose not to register - and without them, there would be a lot fewer articles!

Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 03:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)