Wikipedia:Editor review/Ks0stm (2)

Ks0stm
I'm looking for feedback on how I'm doing and how I can improve as I near my goals of first admin coaching, then adminship. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 20:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * About me and my contributions:

 Reviews 
 * Good job tagging pages for quick deletion so far! Your other edits appear fine, although if you want to be an administrator, you might want to do some more work in Requests for deletion XfDs, or other forms of that, as well as some vandalism reverting.  The more areas you work in that administrators also work in, the better it looks for a potential future administrator, in my honest opinion.  Cheers, Razorflame 22:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * We haven't interacted much, but I occasionally come across you; fine editor to me :)  Reh  man 06:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * As with my last review, mostly work on WP:METEO and WP:Kansas related articles, although I have started getting into more vandalism fighting and new page patrolling. As with before, I am pleased with my contributions as a whole, but the ones that I'm particularly pleased about are my contributions to severe weather related articles.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I still have not encountered what I would call a major dispute, although the goings on at quiz bowl and Articles for deletion/Quizbowl were close. I dealt with that situation, which appeared to have a tad of sockpuppeting involved, by consulting with other editors and keeping my cool. If such disputes/situations arise in the future, I will deal with them by consulting with other editors and fufilling my role as an eagle scout.
 * 1) If you do want to go for admin, it might be a good idea to remove the guestbook. There are people here who think it represents a lack of seriousness & are likely to  hold it against you.  DGG ( talk ) 01:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ removed from the userpage, at least. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 01:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * IMHO, guestbooks are a friendly way to interact with fellow editors, and are in no way a sign of being "not serious". I used to not have one too, and have recently created to be, well, friendly. WP:ENJOY; now whad'ya say, ? ;)  Reh  man 06:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ removed from the userpage, at least. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 01:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * IMHO, guestbooks are a friendly way to interact with fellow editors, and are in no way a sign of being "not serious". I used to not have one too, and have recently created to be, well, friendly. WP:ENJOY; now whad'ya say, ? ;)  Reh  man 06:33, 4 December 2010 (UTC)