Wikipedia:Editor review/Kt1502

Kt1502
Hi all, my name is Kat and I work as a digital consultant. I would really appreciate if you could review my recently proposed changes to a couple of articles on behalf of my clients and provide me with your feedback. Here they are: Trilantic Capital Partners - my proposed changes are saved on the Talk section and then the Churchill Insurance Company page - again, my proposed changes can be found on the Talk section Kt1502 (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I haven't been actively using Wikipedia for a very long time but recently I've mainly worked on behalf of my clients. I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on working with PRs - do you think I should create a new profile for work related edits?
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Well, when I started using Wikipedia on behalf of my clients I made a few changes and was accused of editing with Conflict of Interest. I have apologised left and right and have learned from my mistakes - that's why I'm contacting you here now.
 * 1) What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?
 * I'd like you guys to review my proposed changes to those two articles and let me know your thoughts. I'm happy to go back and add or change anything that needs to be changed. But if you want me to be more specific, it would be great to get the contributors to the Churchill Insurance Company page together to discuss tiding up the page and introducing milestones. I'd also like the editors interested in Trilantic Capital Partners to consider extending it with the information I've provided in the talk section.

 Reviews 


 * Hi there. Judging from your talk page alone, it has been an eventful year.
 * You are very polite and transparent (about the PR work), but it doesn't seem like you are here to improve Wikipedia in general, since majority of your edits are dedicated solely for your clients. While that's not an issue (for me) at all, I do think you should spend a little more time to familiarise with wiki markups and manual of style to make better use of the time (instead of relying on other editors).


 * The most effective way to learn is to imitate established articles in the similar field. For instance, to improve the Sturgeon Ventures LLP article that you are currently working on, why don't you take a look at other articles about investment management firms (like Blackstone Group, a good article?). It would be beneficial in the long run for your paid editing. Alex ShihTalk 00:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)