Wikipedia:Editor review/Legoktm 2

Legoktm
I've been here for a while know, and I am wondering how I have been doing. LegoKontribsTalkM 02:01, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Thanks for saving my arse with the protection label for my iPod Touch image. I was absolutely clueless as to how to define the image, and you assisted me in finding the correct "legal" catagories. Much applause and internal "hupla". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyrferret (talk • contribs)
 * Came here to remove the asterisk and unreviewed template and I thought I'd give a review while I was at it. You've got great edit summary usage, and a good contribs. Lots of anti-vandal work, clean-up and notifications as well as taking part in lots of areas of WIkipedia. I like. Scottydude review 16:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool


 * I've mostly seen your bot-op activity, but I'm impressed with your contributions. Certainly you seem like the kind of editor it's good to have around. – Quadell (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I have worked on Finders Keepers, my first article; AF Cite Book, my first major template; and 2006–07 San Jose Sharks season plus WP:SJS.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No, A few new editors have asked my why I tagged an article for CSD, and why it got deleted. If I got in a conflict, first I would talk it out with them, and if we could not reach an agreement, then ask other editors to help out.
 * No, A few new editors have asked my why I tagged an article for CSD, and why it got deleted. If I got in a conflict, first I would talk it out with them, and if we could not reach an agreement, then ask other editors to help out.