Wikipedia:Editor review/LikeLakers2

LikeLakers2
Hi, I'm LikeLakers2. I wasn't sure about whether I wanted to be reviewed on this page, but after I read over some already-existing reviews that have been answered, I decided to take a shot at it. LikeLakers2 (talk &#124; Sign my guestbook!) 18:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I am usually patrolling Category:Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates and WP:RFPP. I also have reverted vandalism occasionally, and I used to be active on WP:AIV. (I'm not active on AIV anymore; I don't exactly remember why) I am generally one of the more lenient editors of WP; i.e. I sometimes, though not always, let a user off without warning them the first time. (I still revert their vandalism, however)
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * ''Yes, I have, actually. I try not to go too far, while trying to stay calm (and I never am intentionally impolite) in even the rudest/worst of situations.
 * ''Yes, I have, actually. I try not to go too far, while trying to stay calm (and I never am intentionally impolite) in even the rudest/worst of situations.

Additional information: I have a somewhat-self-induced ban on myself, where I am not allowed to edit the userspace and user-talkspace of any user other than my own, unless it is for reverting vandalism, or simply striking up a conversation with a user. I also have somewhat a good sense of humor, though I am not sure if I have ever expressed that directly on-wiki.''

 Reviews 
 * You seem to be good user but he did a little incident in the block log. Congrats! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Tip : Try to use your edit summary more frequently. Doesn't have to be in detail, shorthands (like 'rvv', 'sp' or 'reply') is perfectly okay. - Mailer Diablo 22:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You reintroduced racist material in an article, until you removed it following an IRC discussion. Kiefer .Wolfowitz 14:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)