Wikipedia:Editor review/Limetolime

Limetolime
I am looking to become an administrator, and I want to know the people's consensus first.  Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 23:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You have been using edit summaries to the best of your ability in recent months, if you wish to become an administrator near 100% edit summary usage is expected. RfA reviewers like to look for a wide range of abilities in administrators, so try and get yourself involved in deletion discussions (very important), the village pump, mediation (if you think you could do it), a wider range of wikiprojects (some people say six is a good number) and possibly consider admin coaching. RfA reviewers expect administrators to be able to solve disputes and remain level-headed at all times, so basically keep up the good work and branch out into some more areas if you haven't already. Happy editing! Atyndall93 | talk 03:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am most pleased with the article Superman (film series). I am the top contribuotr to the article and brung it to FA status. I am also plase with the articles Chocolate, Titanic (1997 film), Jurassic Park (franchise), and The Muppets' Wizard of Oz, all of which I was a top/main contribtor and helped bring to GA status. Here is a complete, up-to-date list:


 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have had my fair share of arguments since I first started Wikipedia, and I have dealt with them all through discussion. I intend to do the same in the future, whether it be for deleting an article or blocking a user. I have listed my conflicts here:
 * Articles for deletion/Titanic (1997 film) DVD releases - I was originally very angry with the consensus for this deletion. I had originally worked very hard on the article and submitted it for featured article status (a laughable decision today). But, I realized that shortening the article and including it for Titanic (1997 film) was a big factor in it's good article pass and being a featured article candadate.
 * Articles for deletion/List of feature films released to Blu-ray Disc - The decision to make this aritcle was a timely and humorous one, and I was pretty angry over the decision, but I once again learned some new rules when it comes to creating Wikipedia articles.
 * Articles for deletion/List of feature films released to Blu-ray Disc - The decision to make this aritcle was a timely and humorous one, and I was pretty angry over the decision, but I once again learned some new rules when it comes to creating Wikipedia articles.