Wikipedia:Editor review/Lithorien

Lithorien
Hi there. I'm Lithorien, and I've been on Wikipedia since 2004, though I went through a long time of inactivity due to some immaturity on my part. What I would like to see from this editor review is the opinions of fellow editors on my general Wikipedia behavior and helpfulness - areas that I can improve upon, and things I can do better in terms of helping to keep Wikipedia running well. Lithorien (talk) 17:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I mainly contribute to AfD and monitor the recent changes to catch signs of vandalism and to try to catch newbies and give them a greeting and a little helping hand. There isn't anything that I do that I am particularly pleased or displeased with at this time, because most of what I do is automated or procedural.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have had a time when I was in an editing dispute over an article that was up for deletion. I ended up acting very uncivil through the entire debate. In the future, I plan to remain civil through discussions and come to a consensus rather than attacking my opponents.
 * I have had a time when I was in an editing dispute over an article that was up for deletion. I ended up acting very uncivil through the entire debate. In the future, I plan to remain civil through discussions and come to a consensus rather than attacking my opponents.

 Reviews 


 * I think you are a good user. Your Speedy deletion nominations generally seem accurate and your AfD arguments strong enough, although it would be good to see more content creation. &mdash; Oli OR Pyfan! 11:43, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The point on content creation is one that I definately need to address - it's all well and good to keep Wikipedia cleaned up, but that doesn't do a lot of good if there's still content to be added. Thank you for the review! :) Lithorien (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I think that using speedy deletion in a case like this isn't correct. If this person actually did produce a #1 hit in Japan, then they would be notable. There's at least enough to warrant a discussion or convert to a prod (I'd go with the prod). If this is a case of clear vandalism (which looks likely) that would be different, but you used the non-notable criteria to delete it. My point is to suggest being a little more careful on the speedy deletions.  Royal broil  23:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I will try to remember that and tone down my hair-trigger speedy finger - I tend to forget about prodding when I'm looking at suspicious articles. Thank you very much for that advice. :) Lithorien (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)