Wikipedia:Editor review/Malcolm

Malcolm
Again I just want to know how I'm doing in general. (first ER, second ER, third ER, first RfA, second RfA) &mdash; MalcolmUse the schwartz! 01:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I would draw your attention to User:Ta bu shi da yu's reason for opposing your successful RFA. I supported that RFA, and I'm happy I did because you are using the tools very effectively. However, he makes a valid point - there should be room for editing in your agenda also. Looking through your last 50 edits, I didn't see anything other than reversions, blocking, page protection, and minor edits such as adding a template. I would say this: even if you don't find article writing interesting, you should get involved in activities that support article writing, such as evaluating featured article candidates or "Did you know" candidates. An exclusive focus on technical work can lead to Adminitis.

Keep up the good work! YechielMan 03:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I haven't done many contributions to articles lately, having recently become an admin. I have worked on Mario (before the overhaul) primarily. I've also contributed to Luigi's Mansion and List of Mario antagonists.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * One ongoing conflict with and  over minigame lists of Mario Party. It's a long story, and I'll explain it tomorrow, as I have to leave Wikipedia for now (I know, it's sad).
 * One ongoing conflict with and  over minigame lists of Mario Party. It's a long story, and I'll explain it tomorrow, as I have to leave Wikipedia for now (I know, it's sad).