Wikipedia:Editor review/Mario1987

Mario1987
I began contributing to Wikipedia on 6 March 2007 and i have made 14,383 edits until today mostly on football and energy articles. I would like to apply to WP:RFA some day and I need some oppinions on my edits. Mario 1987  19:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello, Mario. A dig through your article contribution show some really good work, but I see a number of issues you need to address before you can consider running for RfA:
 * Your use of sockpuppets is much too recent for an RfA to pass.  RfA is all about trust, and there are few breaches of trust less accepted than willfully stacking votes to create the appearance of consensus.
 * You forget often to add summaries to edits you make. There is a preference setting to remind you to put one in if you attempt to save an edit without; I recommend you turn it on until you get the reflex.
 * I see very little participation in project space. While that's not an absolute requirement, most editors who comment on RfAs look at past participation in process as an indicator of your familiarity with policy and guidelines.  Working on deletion debates, or helping in dispute resolution (such as giving third opinions) would go a long way to help.
 * All in all, you're a valuable contributor but you need to widen your contributions before you would be likely to pass RfA and I would recommend you get a good year's track record between that socking incident and an RfA. Good editing.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 05:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Punkmorten (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please supply parent categories for every category you create. This is a pet peeve of mine. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Geschichte (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: In the course of this review, I blocked this editor for a month for racist personal attacks at following a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive563.   Sandstein   05:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I can say that i am most pleased by the Faidherbe Bridge article.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No edit wars tried to avoid going to war.
 * No edit wars tried to avoid going to war.