Wikipedia:Editor review/Martijn Hoekstra

Martijn Hoekstra
To become a better Wikipedian, I would like some imput from my peers. There is almost allways something to improve, so I look forward to constructive critisism Martijn Hoekstra 23:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hmmm a difficult review because you do not have a large number of edits to judge you by. Anyway here we go. Although I am not a great fan of massive userpages it may help to put a little more detail about yourself on yours that others may find useful e.g. languages you speak or areas you are expert in. You always seem to use the edit summary for major and mino edits so that it is great. The way you handled yourself over at Talk:Zagreb is good, did not get dragged into being uncivil or upset etc... Cool heads are always good. You seem to be more of a clean up editor, fixing little things that go unnoticed by others, always valuable. I am at a loss for what else to say - you do a good job and have level head, keep up the good work and maybe get more involved if you have time. If you wish me or others to look at a specific issue then please say. Cheers Lethaniol 14:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My work for zagreb where a long running conflict on how a the page should look was ended, and a solution where everyone was happy with could be found. There was some admin help involved, but still.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * The sex related pages get a lot of vandalism. I quite recently removed one from my watchlist, and should delete another too, as there are plenty of wikipedians to keep them promptly clean.
 * 1) Which pages listed at Help:Contents/Getting started have you not read?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Which pages listed at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia have you not read?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) What subject area do you like the best?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) What is your appraisal of the encyclopedia's coverage of that subject area?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) What needs to be done to improve that section of Wikipedia?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) What essential features, in your opinion, is Wikipedia missing?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) What subject area do you like the best?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) What is your appraisal of the encyclopedia's coverage of that subject area?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) What needs to be done to improve that section of Wikipedia?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) What essential features, in your opinion, is Wikipedia missing?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) What needs to be done to improve that section of Wikipedia?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) What essential features, in your opinion, is Wikipedia missing?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) What essential features, in your opinion, is Wikipedia missing?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)